DRAFT Peer Review and Quality Control

نویسندگان

  • Jerome R. Ravetz
  • Silvio O. Funtowicz
چکیده

Peer review is the recognised standard for quality control in science. There is a growing awareness about the need to introduce modifications to the traditional peer review process in order to meet the challenges of a continuously expanding scientific enterprise, the emergence of new forms of science and the impact of new technologies. The growing application of science and science-based technologies to society requires innovative quality control mechanisms and the inclusion of new stakeholders. Collegial peer review is being rapidly transformed to review by an ‘extended peer community, raising important issues to the governance of science.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Peer Review – Legal and Ethical Issues Faced by Medical Staff: The Mandate for Physician Leadership

Physicians working in hospitals face challenges when it comes to understanding and meeting the medical, legal, and ethical subjects outlined in the hospital bylaws. Hospital staff physicians and the hospital administration both aspire for high quality medical care and the assurance of patient safety. Unfortunately, when quality concerns surface, there can be reasonable differences of opinion as...

متن کامل

Writing in natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process

In undergraduate natural science courses, two types of evaluators are commonly used to assess student writing: graduate-student teaching assistants (TAs) or peers. The current study examines how well these approaches to evaluation support student writing. These differences between the two possible evaluators are likely to affect multiple aspects of the writing process: first draft quality, amou...

متن کامل

The Viewpoints of Alborz University of Medical Sciences’ Faculty Members on Open Peer Review of Journal Articles

Background and Aim: The open peer review process, which is one of the peer-reviewed methods in journals, has been accepted in scientific forums. The aim of this study was to investigate the points of view of university faculty members about the open peer review process of journal articles. Materials and Methods: The study used a descriptive survey. The sample size was calculated using the Coch...

متن کامل

Update on Draft Chromium 6 Public Health Goal

The University of California has completed an external scientific peer review of a prerelease draft of OEHHA’s chromium 6 PHG assessment. The peer reviewers were Dr. Leonard Bjeldanes, Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, UC Berkeley; Dr. Roberto Gwiazda, Environmental Toxicology, UC Santa Cruz; and Dr. Michael Kelner, Department of Pathology, UC San Diego. OEHHA is revising its draft assessmen...

متن کامل

A Review on the Editorial Peer Review

Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015